<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Reality Principle</title> <atom:link href="http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/</link> <description>Personal journey, development and life planning</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: BeatSchindler</title><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link> <dc:creator>BeatSchindler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:03:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatschindler.com/?p=68#comment-25</guid> <description>Nancy, excellent question! There&#039;s basically &quot;nothing in between&quot; ... Spirit, too, is what it is &quot;without judgment, filter or rationalization.&quot; The primary means of perception being feelings, how does &quot;Spirit&quot; feel to you? The answer to your question is in how Spirit feels, to you. Let me call upon an anecdote to illustrate the point: a visitor to Niels Bohr&#039;s country cottage, noticing a horseshoe hanging on the wall, teased him - a scientist (Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922 and friend of Albert Einstein&#039;s) - about this ancient superstition. &quot;Can it be that you, of all people, believe it will bring you luck?&quot; &quot;Of course not,&quot; Niels Bohr replied, &quot;but I understand it brings you luck whether you believe or not.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy, excellent question! There&#039;s basically &quot;nothing in between&quot; ... Spirit, too, is what it is &quot;without judgment, filter or rationalization.&quot; The primary means of perception being feelings, how does &quot;Spirit&quot; feel to you? The answer to your question is in how Spirit feels, to you. Let me call upon an anecdote to illustrate the point: a visitor to Niels Bohr&#039;s country cottage, noticing a horseshoe hanging on the wall, teased him - a scientist (Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922 and friend of Albert Einstein&#039;s) - about this ancient superstition. &quot;Can it be that you, of all people, believe it will bring you luck?&quot; &quot;Of course not,&quot; Niels Bohr replied, &quot;but I understand it brings you luck whether you believe or not.&quot;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nancyleeg</title><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link> <dc:creator>Nancyleeg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:39:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatschindler.com/?p=68#comment-24</guid> <description>so how does is-ness fit in with the spirit? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so how does is-ness fit in with the spirit?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: beat88</title><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link> <dc:creator>beat88</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:37:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatschindler.com/?p=68#comment-23</guid> <description>Is-ness, for lack of a better word, refers to what &quot;is&quot;, without judgment, filter, rationalization, words or even us as observers. It always refers to the present moment, and is never circumstantial. It excludes other forms of existence - wished for, imagined, past, future, pre-fixed with &quot;if&quot; or similar. For example, we sometimes describe human behavior as inhuman. Is-ness would hold human behavior is human always, regardless of the obervers&#039; reasoning, justification or appropriateness. Is-ness is not easy to put into words, I hope to have somewhat succeeded. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is-ness, for lack of a better word, refers to what &quot;is&quot;, without judgment, filter, rationalization, words or even us as observers. It always refers to the present moment, and is never circumstantial. It excludes other forms of existence - wished for, imagined, past, future, pre-fixed with &quot;if&quot; or similar. For example, we sometimes describe human behavior as inhuman. Is-ness would hold human behavior is human always, regardless of the obervers&#039; reasoning, justification or appropriateness. Is-ness is not easy to put into words, I hope to have somewhat succeeded.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nancyleeg</title><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link> <dc:creator>Nancyleeg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:31:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatschindler.com/?p=68#comment-22</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know the term &quot;is-ness&quot; - could you clarify for me? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know the term &quot;is-ness&quot; - could you clarify for me?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: beat88</title><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link> <dc:creator>beat88</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:09:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatschindler.com/?p=68#comment-21</guid> <description>Nancy, you are right completely. The reality principle doesn&#039;t hold that one cannot argue with is-ness. It holds that arguing with is-ness is difficult. Our perception of Mount Everest does not alter the mountain, only how we see it. In a practical sense, when we step off a high building, we fall down, or, when we move one end of the stick, we move the other end of the stick, too, etc. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy, you are right completely. The reality principle doesn&#039;t hold that one cannot argue with is-ness. It holds that arguing with is-ness is difficult. Our perception of Mount Everest does not alter the mountain, only how we see it. In a practical sense, when we step off a high building, we fall down, or, when we move one end of the stick, we move the other end of the stick, too, etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nancyleeg</title><link>http://www.beatschindler.com/the-reality-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link> <dc:creator>Nancyleeg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:45:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.beatschindler.com/?p=68#comment-20</guid> <description>Reality is an individual&#039;s perception.  Who is to say whose perception is right.  Of course, there are folks out there whose mindsets may be completely delutionsal or fanatical and most of the &quot;norm&quot; would see their perception so skewed as to be irrational and not reality based.  As far as should haves and could haves, which  I agree are counter-productive,  does not necessarity mean that a person does not believe in a higher power or higher intelligence governing their lives and world.  It would seem that the world is more grey than black and white.  It&#039;s my belief that no one is ever at the same level of &quot;intelligence&quot; - communion with our higher power, and therefore everyone&#039;s reality will never be the same.   Perhaps some folks aren&#039;t resisting the reality principle, they just have to sift the reality they allow in their lives in order to survive. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality is an individual&#039;s perception.  Who is to say whose perception is right.  Of course, there are folks out there whose mindsets may be completely delutionsal or fanatical and most of the &quot;norm&quot; would see their perception so skewed as to be irrational and not reality based.  As far as should haves and could haves, which  I agree are counter-productive,  does not necessarity mean that a person does not believe in a higher power or higher intelligence governing their lives and world.  It would seem that the world is more grey than black and white.  It&#039;s my belief that no one is ever at the same level of &quot;intelligence&quot; - communion with our higher power, and therefore everyone&#039;s reality will never be the same.   Perhaps some folks aren&#039;t resisting the reality principle, they just have to sift the reality they allow in their lives in order to survive.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Database Caching 50/74 queries in 0.046 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.beatschindler.com @ 2012-02-09 15:40:09 -->
